Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 03:13

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What is your review of the Redmi 9A? Is it worth buying?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sarah Michelle Gellar Wants to 'Bring Back Everyone' in the New Buffy - Variety
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Five dead in latest Israeli shootings of Gazans seeking aid, say local officials - Financial Times
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
NBA Draft will have tons of international talent, which is to be expected - NBA
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
How the Brain’s RNA Rings Are Formed - Neuroscience News
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.